Fifield, 41, is the second woman to allege this week that Platner engaged in nonconsensual sexual conduct. Jenny Racicot, 41, who said she previously dated Platner, told The Post and other outlets on Monday that he sexually assaulted her in late 2021, leading a growing number of allies to drop their endorsements and call on him to withdraw from the race for a Maine seat in the U.S. Senate. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), his most influential and prominent supporter, said he spoke with Platner on Tuesday and urged him to withdraw from his campaign to unseat Susan Collins, the incumbent Republican.

Platner, 41, a Marine Corps veteran and oyster farmer, also denied Racicot’s allegation but said on Monday that he was “mindful of the political reality” that the reporting will “inflict” on his campaign and was “taking the time to reflect on the best path forward.”

Fifield initially told The Post about the alleged condom removal during a June 20 interview that was off the record. She said she decided to speak publicly about it Tuesday in part because, she said, she wanted to show that Racicot was not alone in experiencing issues with Platner involving sexual consent.

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Again you’re throwing numbers at me when I’ve already said it’s not about the numbers. It’s the belief that we should not let accusations be the same as convictions.

      • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        When convictions only happen in 2% of cases, we’re allowing victims to suffer and perpetrators to walk. Just because an accusation doesn’t turn into a conviction doesn’t mean rape doesn’t happen.

        • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          When did I try to say rape doesn’t happen? Or that we should allow victims to suffer? Or that perpetrators should walk?

          • velma@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            5 in 6 women could be sexually assaulted and I still would hold off passing judgement until there was at least a hearing.

            Just say you don’t believe women when they come forward with credible rape allegations. If you only ever hold people in judgment when they’re taken to court, you are allowing many rapists and predators slide in your opinion. It’s your prerogative to do so, but you will be judged for it.

            • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I don’t see how that’s connected. If 80% of women were sexually assaulted in the USA, I do not believe we should convict and throw someone in jail because they were accused. Even though there’s an 80% chance it’s true.

              I have no idea how you see the world and who you think you are that you think you can “pass judgement” on people when you’re perspective is so skewed it’s almost 90°.

              But I guess that’s your perogative.