• TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

    Those are the exact words of the 22nd amendment. It’s explicit. There’s no ambiguity or room for other interpretations. Trump was elected twice, he’s hit his limit, that’s it.

    • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Sure, but we didn’t enforce the 14th amendment section 3, which clearly states that he shouldn’t be president currently.

      No one enforced our laws, so we have NO LAWS.

      Which means, he can just run for president again and if no one enforced the law then it could happen again.

      I agree with you on the law, but NO ONE IS ENFORCING ANY LAWS LATELY!!! So what the fuck does any of it even matter anymore? Hmm?

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unless those rumors are true and they did manage to game enough voting machines to clinch the election. In which case he was not actually elected twice…

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        …and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

        • leadore@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          And that’s why Vance and the other fascists are waiting until after the midterms to get rid of trump.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Vance is such a thoroughly unpleasant asshole. Of course, I thought the same thing about donnie for years.

            But I don’t think “JD” “Vance” has this weird hold on the idiots like donnie does. I guess we’ll see.

            Shrug. Somehow, Ted Cruz manages to get elected and it doesn’t seem that anyone really likes him.

            I suppose if the Democrats run a woman and/or someone non-xtian or non-white, there will be people that find a way to support “JD”, I guess.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        3 days ago

        There better be a real fucking riots in the streets across the entire damn nation if they come out with this bullshit.

        Like I mean burning down federal buildings and police stations, storming the homegrown concentration camps to free the prisoners, a literal million+ person march on Washington DC right to the front door of the White House.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            How exactly do you guys think riots would go?

            Do you think Trump would just say, “guess they don’t like me, I’ll leave office”?

            Or do you think he would brutally crack down on everyone against him?

            Riots would be the casus belli he wants to take military control of the country

            • Stormy@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Idk man. They did fly the army apache over them last time there was a big protest in Tennessee and then that time they did that weird stuff with firing the missiles in Cali. You’re right, but something has to change, I think we’re supposed to be brave and strong and united instead of shocked daily and then retreating, frightened, back under a rock to safety.

        • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 days ago

          Like the riots when an insurrectionist was allowed to run for a second term after being ruled ineligible by a State?

          • obvs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            But the Roberts Court, dontchaknow, intervened and went directly against the Constitution and made a BLATANTLY unconstitutional ruling that should have invalidated literally all of their appointments.

            Trump was ineligible for the second term, whether or not the Roberts Court wanted to acknowledge it.

            And hell will freeze over before I give those judges on the Roberts Court the dignity of referring to them with the words that other people call them or that court.

      • Master@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its not the general votes that matter. Its the electoral college. So even if they cheated he was still elected twice.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Sounds like the foundation of our Democracy was built on quick sand, and the cement poured by the shadiest cheapest contractor capitalism could buy.

      • Kenny4tunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Sorry everyone, I used my hall-pass to get re-elected so it didn’t count… wah, I wanna be Mr.President again! Gimme, gimmie, gimmie”

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It does specify that he has to be a person. Perhaps they’re going to argue he isn’t?

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          In a wild turn of events, he’s gonna change his name to Deborah and run as our first trans President, claiming the transition resulted in him being a different person.

    • benderbeerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

      This is why is fun to own a whole ass supreme court:

      No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

      Words are fun for this guy

    • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The one weasel notion that I wonder about, what if he was elected VP and the president stepped down directly after? Then he wasn’t elected a 3rd time but placed by successions. It wouldn’t surprise me to see them try some such fuckary.

      • wittymcusername@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t remember the exact wording, but basically to be eligible to be VP one must meet the eligibility requirements for being President. So he’s not eligible to be VP either.

        But I recall someone claiming that no such eligibility requirement exists for Speaker of the House, who is in the succession line after the VP.

    • Sumocat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes, and none of that prohibits him from running for office again. The only prohibition is that he cannot be elected a third time. But here’s the thing: we don’t actually vote for President; we vote for who our Electors elect as President, and they are Constitutionally prohibited from electing Trump to a third term. If Trump runs and “wins”, the Electors cannot elect him. He can win 0 Electoral votes. Doesn’t matter what their States’ laws require because the Constitution is the highest law in the land… until SCOTUS rules the 22nd Amendment violates the 10th Amendment. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • gwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No person

      Ah that’ll be where he’s trying to get in again then I assume, cause he’s not a person, he’s a monster

    • boatswain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      So it sounds like there’s no prohibition against running, just against winning? Sounds like an easy win for the Dems.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        It seems pointless to run in an election you are constitutionally barred from winning. But, Trump has proven time and time again he will do pointless things. If he tried running again and somehow he won, however, the constitution is clear: it’s a no go. He can’t get elected for a third time. That said, I don’t think that’s necessarily the point. I think the point is to create chaos and crisis. Hopefully he’s not around to run in 2028 so it becomes a moot.

    • GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      It doesn’t matter what it says when neither courts nor law enforcement will enforce it. Looks like we’re running out of democracy boxes.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      There’s wiggle room, he’s claiming a right to campaign. To run… He’s not saying anything about being elected.

      He doesn’t actually do the electing. That’s up to public, and the officials who are in charge of elections (who he’ll try to stack with loyalists). He can’t say what they’ll do.

      He runs, and if others elect him… Well… That’s the wiggle room.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s not wiggle room, it’s violating the Constitution. Not saying it can’t happen, but it’s not like that’s a logic loophole, it’s just not caring about acting illegally.