sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoCleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Themwww.gadgetreview.comexternal-linkmessage-square201fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.01Karrow-down1external-linkCleveland Voted to Kill Its Flock Camera Network. They Have REMAINED ON, With Police Still Using Themwww.gadgetreview.comsanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square201fedilink
minus-squareiLStrix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·4 months agoI would argue strong lasers are more dangerous than guns on average.
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoDepends on the definition of “strong”. If you mean “a laser that melts down the Flock camera into a steaming puddle”, then I’d agree. But if you mean “a laser that kills a CCD chip”, then no.
I would argue strong lasers are more dangerous than guns on average.
Depends on the definition of “strong”.
If you mean “a laser that melts down the Flock camera into a steaming puddle”, then I’d agree. But if you mean “a laser that kills a CCD chip”, then no.