toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 day agoWhat's your entirely unimportant and inconsequential hot take?message-squaremessage-square400fedilinkarrow-up1193arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1191arrow-down1message-squareWhat's your entirely unimportant and inconsequential hot take?toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 day agomessage-square400fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaret_berium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 hours agoOK, I’ll be the one: DD-MM-YYYY is the way to go.
minus-squareKissaki@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoThat doesn’t sort well. If you read left to right, you can’t assume year so you have to read it in full, working backwards, to get the full meaning. Year first means you get more specific while reading. Natural logic and hierarchy in reading direction.
minus-squaret_berium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoI’m not sure if I can see your point. Is this a programming thing? I’ve seen this sentiment a couple of times on Lemmy and I don’t get it. For me it’s more logical to state a date the way you speak (I’m no English native speaker, though).
OK, I’ll be the one: DD-MM-YYYY is the way to go.
That doesn’t sort well. If you read left to right, you can’t assume year so you have to read it in full, working backwards, to get the full meaning.
Year first means you get more specific while reading. Natural logic and hierarchy in reading direction.
I’m not sure if I can see your point. Is this a programming thing? I’ve seen this sentiment a couple of times on Lemmy and I don’t get it. For me it’s more logical to state a date the way you speak (I’m no English native speaker, though).