• psycotica0@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    He just lost more money than I ever have in my whole life put together! What a loser!!! 😛

  • skvlp@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Keep sliding. Then drop off. Then plunge. Then crash whole heartedly.

  • Dryad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well that’s good news, but he’s still immorally rich and in need of taxation.

  • NM_Gringo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    The best part was the Elmo fan bois watching their investment go up in smoke because dickweed diluted their shares by almost a third during the lockup period. Honestly, even I thought that was a move that reeks of desperation.

  • volore@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    so this website is complete dogshit and continually reloads the page for me on Firefox on android, having something of a small fit; and it seems to be paywalled anyways as a subscription nag did partially load at one point; but what I can see from the article is this hilarious subtitle/header:

    The stock market selloff this week has been painful for investors, but spare a thought for Elon Musk.


    Unless that thought is to laugh. And the investors can get bent, too.

  • Katherine 🪴@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Elon was never a trillionaire because he never actually had that money; it was all invested in an overinflated meme stock.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Stop.

      This “billionaires don’t have any real money” is ignorant.

      The investments have value, the value is leverage and loans, those are power and money. Yes, it can fluctuate due to market value, but nonetheless that’s what billionaires are worth.

      It’s real money.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          And your physical dollars lose value with inflation. Money isn’t real. Buying power is. He has a trillion dollars worth of buying power. It doesn’t matter if it’s in dollars, gold, cows, or stock, as long as he can effectively use that power to make purchases.

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Go try and get an interest free loan from the bank.
          Go “earn” a billion dollars in stock and try again.

          I guarantee you’ll have real money the second time. Sure they don’t sit on cash but billionaires absolutely tap into that stock as equity and use it like cash. Many vehicles for doing so are well documented

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes I am aware of how they extract money from their stock holdings as propublica showed us.

            My point, Elon couldn’t recognize a trillion dollars. He probably couldn’t realize a hundred billion in actual cash. The more he realizes, the more his holdings decline in value. And he downturn is coming, although he will get bailed out I’m sure.

            • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              1 day ago

              My point is you’re arguing irrelevant semantics. They’re out buying $500 million dollar superyachts. That’s close enough to enough of their net worth being real money to make the distinction irrelevant.

              • bedwyr@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                500 million is a fraction of their stated wealth, it’s not semantics to recognize that they are one downturn away from seeing their wealth evaporate, and possible margin calls against that money they did realize tax free by borrowing against their stock.

                • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Sure, the yacht is only 500 million, that also doesn’t include the 75 meter support yacht he often has sailing with it. Now add in his 4 private jets (roughly $250 million total), his three mansions on an almost private island off of Miami (roughly $240 million total), his roughly $40 million into his Washington DC house, his 30,000 acre ranch, his properties in Beverly Hills and Manhattan, and more I’m probably forgetting about (I know he owns more ranch land than just that 30k acre property, it’s just the most well known since it now hosts his space company). Not even counting clothes (which Bezos is known to have a pricey watch collection despite wearing a “reserved” choice usually), food, and other expenses which definitely add up. That’s a solid billion right there in real things he’s bought.

                  Sure they can’t tap the full “value” of their net worth, but the more they have, the more they can tap. And it’s a disgusting amount. And they absolutely treat it as cash equivalent.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yes, it can fluctuate due to market value,

          I literally stated that possibility.

          What are you saying? Are you trying to make some financial hot take? Are you trying to still imply it’s not worth real money? Won’t anyone think of the poor trillionaire who is now only simultaneously worth/not worth hundreds of billions? The path you’re going down leads to “is any money real money?” and adds nothing to the conversation.

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            That their money is not “real” at all as you suggest was my point. It will go up in smoke.

            • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Understanding this level of finance is not hard and I don’t understand what you’re trying to prove or your resistance to it.

              What a billionaire is doing is no different (as a radical simplification to make it easy to understand) than a normal person taking a home equity loan. Your argument is that “the home isn’t real” and that’s the same as saying “SpaceX isn’t real”. The home’s value can fluctuate thanks to the real estate market, or whether or not the owner does a good job maintaining and upgrading the home. SpaceX can suffer market fluctuations and be well managed or suffer bad decisions. The money leveraged on the values of these investments is real.

              As far as what you just said I can tell that you haven’t thought one step further than making the statement, I am pointing out how the money is real. We’re done here, you plainly want to be right rather than learn how the system works.

              • bedwyr@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                The intrinisc values of his companies, and others, are a fraction of their current market value.

                When you borrow against it, when the price falls back to intrinsic value, in Musk’s case 1/100th or so of Tesla’s current valuation, they get margin calls.

                My point is not hard to understand and undeniably true. Owning theoretical money you can’t realize in full is not the same as owning assets that can be realized. Musk is not trillionaire, never was.

        • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          All money is theoretical money.

          The larger the amount the more theoretical it is, but even the crisp $5 bill in your pocket is just the promise of violence if somebody doesn’t have enough $$$ to pay their housing costs at the end of the month or their taxes at the end of the year.

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Actual money is not theoretical money as such, don’t conflate the theoretical nature of money with the subject at hand. Kind of discredits you that you made that argument.

            • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              All money is theoretical, even commodity backed money or commodities themselves are only worth what you can exchange for them, in that regard the $5 in your pocket is exactly as “real” as a stock Elon has with $5 you can both use it to purchase $5 worth of stuff.

              Kind of discredits you that you made that argument.

              Nah, saying shit like that actually discredits you though.

    • fpslem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      OMG this, and the breathless media reporting about that fictional title are part of the problem. Just the dumbest way to run an economy.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I desperately wish that he could have his wealth crumble to dust, having been a trillionaire for a minute.

      I know its not going to happen but a guy can dream.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Piece of shit still gets to say ‘I was the first trillionaire’, likely the big thing for him.