• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    so same thing as for wind turbines then

    Edit: as in, they should not be built where people live because you can feel the vibrations and it has a measurable effect on your vascular health. i linked a paper.

    • lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      For those speaking german, I’m linking to a podcast episode of the Quarks Science Cops (Public Broadcast) about this topic. Link to Youtube

      Spoiler: We already have way louder infrasound producers near us. Wind turbines are already build in quite a distance to be safe from flying debris in case of a catastrophic mechanical breakdown of the spinning blades.

    • KingKong33@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There’s tons of evidence for data centers, but I’ve never heard the same for wind turbines. Do you have a source?

      • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Can confirm I have seen tons of articles over the years of residents complaining about low frequency hum from wind turbines. Just Google it. In comments sections, it generally gets written off as bullshit or the residents just hating clean energy. Now the same scenario comes up for data centers and people want to accept it as a legitimate problem.

        I dunno, but maybe being exposed to a constant non-stop noise that never turns off might not be good for humans, no matter what the source is.

    • arockinyourshoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I would love to see your explanation for why wind turbines have as much a negative impact on people’s health as hyperscale data centers.

        • lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          From the first scimming, I would not give much credit to that study. Only 29 participants. But most importantly it was not double blind. The participants where instructed on what exactly the study wanted to find out and could easily see, how far they where from the wind turbine at the testing sides. Thats a programmed placebo effect.

          Also: They only measured at 2 sites. The outdoor site was only 20m from the wind turbine. That is a distance not even relevant to placement of wind turbines. The safety distance to the spinning blades will already be significantly higher, at least 100m. So the measurement at that side might be interesting, but irrelevant.