• python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Fuck those glasses. But also, my brain can’t let go of the question of “How would I feel if I saw a woman wearing these?”. And honestly I’m not sure??? Like you could make an argument that at least they would deter creepy men?? Anyone got any thoughts on that?

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Women can be creeps too. It’s less common but there are still plenty.

  • sunbytes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    Ah hell. My only pair of sunglasses is a 5 year old pair of raybans.

    I’d better not get “pervert glasses” shouted at me.

    • Cybersteel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      I threw away my rayban frames spectacles for a transparent plastic one due to having people come up to me and trying to start something.

  • swooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m never buying Ray Bans again. I don’t want to be associated, fuck Ray Bans for taking that cash.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    also it has the stigma of Zuckerberg using his companies as datamining, spying, right wing peddling platforms. his name was enough to derail anything that comes out of meta.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      100%. I’ve been saying it for years that at the end of the day, the only punishment that actually works is the public shaming.

      Bring back the public perp walks. March the criminal through the streets with a big banner announcing their crime, and then leave them them in a public cell in the middle of town for a few days with their name on it, their crime, and no privacy so that people can come and see them.

      A few days of that will do more to cure recidivism than any jail you can name.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s nice to see no one learned anything from Google Glass. This is why we’re fucked as a species…

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      ive only seen it once it public and then never after that day. i think people got the message the moment articles came out about it. but Zuckerborg intends to push this out regardless.

      • cecinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I dealt with a couple that I was proud of.

        The first time I saw them was an object I talked to on the train. It was the line that went to/from the airport, so you get a broader class mix. The conversation was nice at first, friendly, there were jokes. Then it showed me the glasses-it was already wearing actual glasses so it explained what they were and started talking about capacity of the charging case thing. They were still a very new thing, I was tired and not as aggressive as I should have been, so when it took them out and said what they were I just said ‘fuck you.’, put on my best scowl, and walked away. When it came up I reached into my purse and gave it my best cold ‘you want to get the fuck away from me.’. I left and switched cars at the next stop, and told people as I left that the guy at the other end is a glasshole as I left, in a way that was clearly just to them.

      • S4m_S3p1l@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Who woulda’ thought suckerberg - the man responsible for running intelligence ops on billions of devices in broad daylight, would be outta touch with evolving cultural norms!

  • DudeWhoYapsTooMuch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s probably because the fucking glasses were used by the worst people at first. They were used by dudebros and weirdos who wish to do harm towards others. That’s why people called them Perv glasses. Which isn’t surprisng given Zuckerberg’s whole M.O.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “I saw all these comments about if you wear those glasses you’re basically a predator or a creep, and I was like, ‘Oh, maybe it’s not a good idea to have those,’” said Kujawa. "I didn’t really think that through all the way… there are a lot of times where it’s not appropriate to wear cameras on your face."

    Words to live by.

    CEO Mark Zuckerberg remains convinced that smart glasses will eventually replace the smartphone.

    Sure, Jan.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      CEO Mark Zuckerberg remains convinced that smart glasses will eventually replace the smartphone.

      Just a regular reminder that facebook has a massive child sex material trade problem, that they’ve actively done nothing to prevent, but they have called police on reporters reporting on it.

      So Zuckerberg wanting his creepnology on every face, in every bathroom, hospital, etc, while he gets a copy of every video, is very much in character

      • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah having to let the battery die on a patient’s prescription glasses that they needed to like. Not fall down while walking. Was not a fun couple of shifts.

      • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Well, yeah. It starts with people sharing “just family photos,” and the monsters make it a cesspool.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          So…

          I inherited my grandmother’s house. I’m a heterosexual bachelor, I don’t give a shit about decoration, so the automotive tools and 3D printing detritus, house cat, and electronics shit from about waist down are mine, the artwork and curtains and shit at chest level and above are still my grandmother’s.

          Included in this is one of those “one large frame full of a bunch of individual family photos” things that ceased to be manufactured during Dubya’s first term. In it is a picture of a bunch of relatives of mine hanging out in a back yard, the last of whom died last month, a black and white photo of my father when he was 7, a dageurrotype of my great grandfather’s first wedding…

          And a polaroid of me, age 2, scrote ass naked, riding Bradley. Who the fuck is Bradley. So, while I was a fetus, my family went to a state fair. My father decided to stop at the carnie section to play ring toss. My hilariously pregnant 5 foot tall mother wanted to play too. So Dad gave her a fistful of rings. And she got one. As my dad tells it, the second my mama cheered, that carnie took the rest of those rings from my father, chucked them in a different, empty basket presumably to inspect them to make sure they are in fact smaller than the neck of the bottles, and begrudgingly told her to pick out one of the hilariously huge stuffed animals on display, and she picked a life-size tiger. On the way back out of the fair, my family walked past a National guard exhibit, including several tanks and armored vehicles. My grandmother, the idiot that decided to carpet my bathroom, noticed the sign next to a particularly large tank-like machine said “Bradley Fighting Vehicle” and she said “Oh how cute, they named it.” And lo the 6 foot long polyester tiger was named Bradley.

          Three years later, I got out of a bath tub, and before some toddler sized tighty-whiteys happened I mounted that very tiger like a horse, which amused my father enough to go get the family Instamatic. My grandmother ended up owning the resulting photograph, time makes corpses of us all, I inherited my grandmother’s estate to include a 37 year old picture of my own dick.

          So when I build my drinks cabinet intended to go on that wall, and pull down that photo collage and give it to my parents, one of whom was the photographer of several of those family photos, am I going to be arrested for trafficking child porn?

          Probably, in Trump’s America.

          • MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            You write well. Also, is it illegal to possess a naked picture of oneself as a child?

            I guess it’s about the risk of someone viewing it sexually.

              • MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                Correct me if I’m wrong but the key to any good long text/speech is having as many interesting visual descriptions as possible. Emphasis on interesting.

                • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 hours ago

                  See? Imagery. And also, buy a bottle of bourbon and a bottle of rye with the excuse of doing A-B comparisons of Old Fashioned cocktails, drink like 6 and come away with the opinion that your favorite between the two is Luxardo cherries.

    • tristynalxander@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      CEO Mark Zuckerberg remains convinced that smart glasses will eventually replace the smartphone.

      If they didn’t have a camera, I think they’d stand a better chance. I think they should just be a screen that links to your phone and peripherals. Honestly the little wrist typing input seem pretty cool to me. If I could type with them onto like a low-res glass ink display it’d be fine. I’m not gonna wear a camera on my face nor am I going to wear some bulky nonsense, just no chance. If they could look like slim glasses and take wireless power from something on my neck or headphones, I think they’d be a viable peripheral input product.

      Zuckerberg wants wants to put the compute on your face, for some reason. Even turning the phone into a brick you interact with through the peripherals seems unrealistic since the glasses would need to have multicolor display without being bulky. Dude needs some people with basic sense to tell him no and guide him to something more realistic.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If they didn’t have a camera they’d be pointless, there’s really no reason to have a screen on your face if it wasn’t to help AR the world.

        Which is why it’s going to need an extremely valid reason to use them aside from being a creeper.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          40 minutes ago

          there’s really no reason to have a screen on your face

          Look around. People have a screen on their face 24/7. Currently they need their hand to hold it there.

          Maybe you mean there is no need for a camera on your face. That I agree with.

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Lidar, rather than a camera. Allows it to create a 3d model of what’s in front of it without being able to take pictures itself

        • darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          So there are certainly some valid use cases. They could be useful for surgeries, engineering design work, surveying, etc. None of these have you wearing them all the time or in social areas through. It’s a niche product they need to focus on those markets and stop trying to force mass adoption. It’s the same as AI.

        • tristynalxander@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          There’s a long history of pointless peripherals and people finding obscure use cases. I wouldn’t mind trying to write or code with them. I’m not sure if it’d work since writing these days usually involves a full office suite and coding invovles some sort of IDE… maybe texting? notes in class? Very basic games like Pong? a search function? Reading like a kindle?

          I can see some neat little things being appealing.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      They will, unfortunately. I hate these things but I know that as soon as influencers make them cool, the shame will go away.

      I really want to be wrong about this.