• tristynalxander@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    CEO Mark Zuckerberg remains convinced that smart glasses will eventually replace the smartphone.

    If they didn’t have a camera, I think they’d stand a better chance. I think they should just be a screen that links to your phone and peripherals. Honestly the little wrist typing input seem pretty cool to me. If I could type with them onto like a low-res glass ink display it’d be fine. I’m not gonna wear a camera on my face nor am I going to wear some bulky nonsense, just no chance. If they could look like slim glasses and take wireless power from something on my neck or headphones, I think they’d be a viable peripheral input product.

    Zuckerberg wants wants to put the compute on your face, for some reason. Even turning the phone into a brick you interact with through the peripherals seems unrealistic since the glasses would need to have multicolor display without being bulky. Dude needs some people with basic sense to tell him no and guide him to something more realistic.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If they didn’t have a camera they’d be pointless, there’s really no reason to have a screen on your face if it wasn’t to help AR the world.

      Which is why it’s going to need an extremely valid reason to use them aside from being a creeper.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        there’s really no reason to have a screen on your face

        Look around. People have a screen on their face 24/7. Currently they need their hand to hold it there.

        Maybe you mean there is no need for a camera on your face. That I agree with.

      • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Lidar, rather than a camera. Allows it to create a 3d model of what’s in front of it without being able to take pictures itself

      • darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So there are certainly some valid use cases. They could be useful for surgeries, engineering design work, surveying, etc. None of these have you wearing them all the time or in social areas through. It’s a niche product they need to focus on those markets and stop trying to force mass adoption. It’s the same as AI.

      • tristynalxander@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        There’s a long history of pointless peripherals and people finding obscure use cases. I wouldn’t mind trying to write or code with them. I’m not sure if it’d work since writing these days usually involves a full office suite and coding invovles some sort of IDE… maybe texting? notes in class? Very basic games like Pong? a search function? Reading like a kindle?

        I can see some neat little things being appealing.