

32·
23 hours agoI think the point isn’t that the journal is factually incorrect, rather an industry mired by waste isn’t redeemed by one useful thing.


I think the point isn’t that the journal is factually incorrect, rather an industry mired by waste isn’t redeemed by one useful thing.


I don’t understand your math.


$150,000 fine per civil infringement X 6,008 instances… $901,200,000.
Now assume a settlement for half the value and it’s still $450M
Do it porn industry! On principle.
No, it still wastes. Asbestos is a good insulator, but that doesn’t make its cancerous properties less bad.