Dude, what you give LLM is not instructions. It doesn’t follow your instructions. It brings you back what might look like you want.
A CPU, on the other hand, carries out the instructions exactly like you’ve said.
There is no way to avoid incorrect answers from LLM. It’s probablistic; there is always a chance of getting a wrong answer no matter how you improve it. With a CPU, you can reduce errors by improving the design. It’s based on physics; it’s logical.
I advice you to stop treating LLMs as blackboxes and only observe it from the outside. You’ll never notice the difference if the error rate is low enough.
Dude, what you give LLM is not instructions. It doesn’t follow your instructions. It brings you back what might look like you want.
A CPU, on the other hand, carries out the instructions exactly like you’ve said.
There is no way to avoid incorrect answers from LLM. It’s probablistic; there is always a chance of getting a wrong answer no matter how you improve it. With a CPU, you can reduce errors by improving the design. It’s based on physics; it’s logical.
I advice you to stop treating LLMs as blackboxes and only observe it from the outside. You’ll never notice the difference if the error rate is low enough.