Yes thanks for the knee jerk response. My questioning was about whether this is the best strategy to address the wealth hoarding. But sure, let’s do this feel good vote no matter how ineffective it will be…. This is no long term solution, and the “one time only” wording is super suspicious.
They won’t “might fight it”. They absolutely will fight it.
What are the advantages of this measure over an actual tax increase? I feel like the state will spend as much money fighting to uphold the measure in court as it would receive. If you’re voting for it, cool. But this issue needs to be addressed at the Federal level.
This measure isn’t “trying”