I’ve avoided that platform so yes if I’m understanding you correctly.

I trust this as much as I trust big American tech platforms.

An interview that asks me to execute 3rd party code on my machine is an instant no from me. They can give me a dataset in plain text and ask me to do something with it in a certain language, but running a whole code base is sketch as hell.

Man when did those idiots doing “social experiments” on YouTube get into polling?

Is naming things hard? Sometimes absolutely! Should you off load that cognitive load to AI? Only if you want to get worse at writing and maintaining code.

The amount of content on here is less plentiful, so browsing all and blocking the communities you don’t like has been how I curated my feed. If a community doesn’t exist you can always make one (easier said than done I know).

Fuck this article’s title. Consumer friendly actions are only dangerous to the parasites in the 1% who will now only get a slightly smaller fuck ton of money. Eat shit Polygon. OP I’m not mad at you.

This is just marketing bullshit as OpenAI tries to hype themselves up for their IPO. Anytime an “AI” company says their models are too dangerous or did something like this it’s just to make people think the “AI” is way more powerful/intelligent than it actually is.

They learned nothing from the NFT/“Metaverse” hype cycle, but a century of hindsight might help. There’s always going to be that golden goose that can make you insanely rich based on vague bullshit a lot of people don’t fully understand.