

Literally everyone I knew thought impeachments automatically kicked you out of office until his first one, and it’s insane that they don’t do that.


Literally everyone I knew thought impeachments automatically kicked you out of office until his first one, and it’s insane that they don’t do that.


So the thing is, most centenarians happen to be from places that are either terrible at book keeping or at some point had a lot of their written records destroyed. There’s a strong chance that most centenarians aren’t actually over 100 years old, that their birth certificates were either faked or mismanaged along the way.


This pedantic argument annoys me so much. We’ve called basic ass decision trees for NPCs in games AI for a while now, any program that can make a decision based on data is an AI.
If you don’t like it, you’re more than free to provide the world with a true all-encompassing definition of intelligence that everyone can agree on, you’ll join all the others that tried.


Seriously when will a progressive finally do some rebranding? Call your position “Freedomism” and scream it from the rooftops to establish it. Make the tenets* of Freedomism the exact same as Socialism but Americanized™.
Edit: *Fixed a typo
I feel like the big official sounding word of “impeachment” should be reserved for after the Senate convicts. Otherwise it’s just a meaningless gesture on behalf of the House.
I began searching to see how Bill Clinton was removed, then I realized the Senate acquitted him and his term naturally ended later that month. Andrew Johnson also wasn’t convicted.
This mechanism of removing the president from office has literally never worked before! The whole impeachment process is an overhyped nothing burger!
Edit: I should add that all three presidents had the majority of Senate vote to convict at least one of the impeachment charges, but they needed a 2/3rds supermajority because why not?