

Dems are as bad, I’m not campaigning for Trump. If I’m saying Dems are as bad as Republicans, Republicans must be pretty damn bad. That’s isn’t the typical endorsement of support from someone.


Dems are as bad, I’m not campaigning for Trump. If I’m saying Dems are as bad as Republicans, Republicans must be pretty damn bad. That’s isn’t the typical endorsement of support from someone.


Young voters that are clueless of her history. And only hear the whitewashed version spewing populist rhetoric.


Nothing about the $100m spent in 2024 by AIPAC to influence US elections? AIPAC is a larger threat to the US than anything any other country could do


They are not wrong


They still believe that using 1950s strongarm tactics works. And crickets about AIPAC spending over $100m to influence US elections
They should focus inward on their own attempts to manipulate opinion.


I’m using Trump’s quote because liberals quote it while ignoring their team is finishing the job.


You are trying to conflate MAGA and the QAnon freaks.


Just to be clear how has voting for the same people expecting different results changed literally anything? We are having the exact same conversations about wages, housing, employment, healthcare education, etc. that they were having during the civil rights movements, that they were having during the Great depression. If we’re continuing to have the exact same conversations, things are not getting any better


Page 308 of P2025.
The Forest Service should instead be focusing on addressing the precipitous annual amassing of biomass in the national forests that drive the behavior of wildfires. By thinning trees, removing live fuels and deadwood, and taking other preventive steps, the Forest Service can help to minimize the consequences of wildfires. Increasing timber sales could also play an important role in the effort to change the behavior of wildfire because there would be less biomass.
Nowhere in the document does it imply to cut all forests, but to thin them and clear out accumulated biomass, exactly as Biden has proposed.
This must be why the author only posted a link to P2025 and not the actual text, relying on the reader to assume they were being honest.
Get better


Like ive always said P2025 has always been 100% bipartisan


When one of those sides completely defunded UNRWA they are the same, When one of those sides keeps providing weapons and money to slaughter Palestinians, they are the same. When Biden and Harris are providing those weapons and money to Israel they are allowing Netanyahu to ‘finish the job’


Voting for the same people and policies and expecting a different result is the infantile concept


I would rather vote for what I want in government and not get it than to vote against something and get it anyway. Democrats voted against Trump and his policies in 2020 and got someone keeping his worst policies, and now want someone even further to the right than Biden was.


I trust Greens to protect environmental policies much more than the DNC, they would follow through with their promises and not just spout populous bullshit while doing nothing.


False dichotomy with ‘you are either with us or against us.’
BlueMAGA are as clueless and uninformed as MAGA


Poor attempt at a false dichotomy. and binary thinking


Refer everyone back to where I said vote for Trump


Those of us that voted for Nader and Stein never would have voted for your shitty candidates. To begin with, your entire premise is based on the liberal ‘spoiler vote’ which is 100% myth. There could be zero third party candidates on the ballot and we still would not vote for a republican or a Democrat because we are not Republicans or Democrats.
When they lay the ground work for these things to happen, yes