Now a days people refer to AI instantly for an answer. Maybe it’s a problem they could have solved within 10min in their head or a question they could have done an internet search on and read a few forums to figure out. However, now people go straight to AI which is known to give many many wrong answers.

I know a couple people that fit this bill and now I almost completely disregard what they say. We’ll even be talking face to face and they’ll ask AI something from our conversation in real time.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It depends what they ask.

    A lot of questions are fairly accurate to ask AI.

    Also, some people are smart enough to habe configured their pre-prompt to reduce common issues with AI platforms.

    There’s a big difference between:

    “Hey whats the answer to (esoteric question)”

    Vs

    “Hey can you find me a paper on (well documented topic)” (and then opening the paper up and reading the actual source)

    Using it as a powerful fuzzy search tool with semantic intent is fine.

    Its the difference between asking a librarian how to cure cancer, vs asking the librarian to help you quickly find a book on cancer treatments.

    • john_lemmy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      But isn’t that just a good search engine we should have separate to a LLM at that point? Semantic search doesn’t need a full blown chat not in between.