By now, it’s clear that the only way the tech industry can justify the cost of AI is if it replaces vast swaths of the human workforce with machines that run 24/7.

The bad news is that this situation has created a world-historic financial market that, by some metrics, is looking worse than the run-up to the Great Depression. The good news is that this future of an AI takeover is looking increasingly unlikely, at least at the industry’s current pace, a fact which is now dawning on some of the biggest rubes and dupes in the corporate world.

According to a new survey from “Big Four” accounting firm KPMG, a significant number of corporate executives are reeling from sticker shock over new usage-based AI pricing schemes. Though enterprises could once count on AI companies to subsidize the price of large language models via flat-rate contracts, that’s no longer a given, as the rising cost of computational power forces the entire tech sector into a defensive posture.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    how do you agree to the payment scheme and accept the work and then gauff at the bill. this is some serious idiotocracy type of shit.

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      It sounds like companies started using these systems with flat rate billing ($10000/mo.) and later the ai companies moved clients to usage based billing ($10/1k tokens).