like for example: react, C# WebM, WebP, av1, and many more

some parts that big tech made, are really hard to replace, due to them, being complex or fundamental to a speific system

how would we replace them (i hope there are existing replacements for the examples i talked about)?

  • NoLemurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Not everything made by big tech is bad.

    React is great. It’s open source. The governance is reasonable. Why should we replace it?

    WebP, WebM and AV1 are great open technical formats. We should use them.

    If a standard is truly open, then you should judge it on its technical merits, not some weird purity test about where it came from.

    • Adniem@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      sorry to say it, but that maybe wrong, because its big tech, once there are no actual non corporate competitors, they will ruin it

      we should know that when we do depend on something too much, it gets ruined

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        it’s open source though. just clone the previous version and keep building on that. that’s how we got valkey, postgresql, libreoffice, webkit, jenkins, mariadb, all the bsd’s, plex, xorg, wordpress, inkscape, openssh, apache, etc etc etc

      • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Enshittification is SOP. Its open now because they want to lure market diversity into their ecosystem. You have a point.

        Judging by the downvotes, it seems we never learn.

  • YourBestFriend@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Slowly and with an open source offering. But also by making the alternatives so easy that choosing proprietary is actually harder.