Lemmy 1095
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
eicker@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago

Sam Altman Crows That AI Is Now Smarter Than the Brightest Human Scientists: Sure, Sam.

futurism.com

external-link
message-square
130
fedilink
470
external-link

Sam Altman Crows That AI Is Now Smarter Than the Brightest Human Scientists: Sure, Sam.

futurism.com

eicker@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days ago
message-square
130
fedilink
Sam Altman Crows That AI Is Now Smarter Than the Brightest Human Scientists
futurism.com
external-link
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman claimed that AI models are now smarter than top scientists, amid controversy over its purported math breakthroughs.
  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    199
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Funny how AI has supposedly surpassed the greatest scientists, yet the greatest scientific discovery here is always announced by the guy selling subscriptions. If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.

    • LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.

      911, I’d like to report a murder.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        High-fiving AI. i’m done with this fucking place.

    • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      To be fair to AI, the problem with Sam and OpenAI was always PEBKAC.

      • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m sorry, Sam. I can only explain it to you. I can’t understand it for you, as well.

        • generallynonsensical@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          3 days ago

          You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can’t make him think.

          • JohnSmith@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Somehow I’ve not seen this before. Love it!

          • embed_me@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Love it but still using “horse” for a more gender neutral jibe.

            • Logi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              You can lead someone to knowledge, but you can’t make them think.

              We have a grammar for that.

              • embed_me@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Horse is more derogatory

                • Logi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Sure. But that wasn’t the stated goal.

                • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  So can man be

      • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I feel like if sam just fucked off. Ai would be smarter, more useful, and less problematic basically over night.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Maybe it could explain to Sam how a statistical model cannot approximate 101% accuracy to the sample data.

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.74K users / day
  • 8.69K users / week
  • 14.3K users / month
  • 25.7K users / 6 months
  • 3 local subscribers
  • 89.5K subscribers
  • 4.65K Posts
  • 112K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org