• ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    When it was introduced the Pi cost $15

    It was a 700MHz single core board with 512mb of ram…and it was $35, not $15

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      And if tech had been proceeding since then as it did for the previous 30 years, you’d expect a whole lot more power for your $15 $35 now.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        An ESP32-P4 is about the same ram, better IO options, but half the CPU of the original Pi for about $20 right now. So the tech has been progressing a little bit.

        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s also been 14 years. “About the same ram…but half the CPU” for over half the price (original comment was wrong, it was $35, not $15) is not a flex. It’s a stunning failure.

          • europeancricket@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            The economic aspect of Moore’s law has been broken. Luckily we still have capabilities for a few more years of innovation in the performance scaling. For now.

        • solrize@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          The original Pi had 512MB not KB. It ran Linux and had an SD card “disk”. The ESP32 series aren’t in the same class.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The Pi Pico is a 32-bit processor for far less than $20.

          A microcontroller is in a completely different category from the Pi 5

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It was also $35 at release, not $15

        You’re roughly getting 150x the power for 10x the cost with the current price hike.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          You’re roughly getting 150x the power for 10x the cost with the current price hike.

          Maybe in a vacuum, but in a world with millions or even billions of ‘legacy’ devices sitting around collecting dust that have equal or better compute power for less cost, these devices don’t really make sense.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            No I completely agree, they make no sense these days. I was just saying that innovation has actually carried them forward and how much more power you actually get compared to the original raspis.

        • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          But a powerful CPU was never the point of the raspi. It was intended to be a cheap computer for your own hobby projects, iot setup and to learn about hardware, sensors and programming. The price was low so it would not ruin you if you made a mistake and fried the hardware.

          This is no longer the case when it costs 3 digits.

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Moore’s law ran for 40 years but hit a wall around 2010 due to physics.

        “Free” upgrades ended long before AI bros started buying up all the RAM and GPUs.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          It slowed around 2010 while Intel sat on its arse for quite a few years, but then transistors started shrinking again. This page has a chart suggesting the law has pretty much continued to hold. But we know that can’t continue because things really are starting to hit physical limits now.

    • privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Just to be pedantic: mb would be millibits, or thousandths of a bit. MB is its big brother megabytes.

      Fun fact: a kb is a thousand thousand times bigger than a mb!