• dou9m@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      “an interpretation of reality”… so it’s just a re-occurring thought lmao?

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No it’s a set of fundamental assumptions about the nature of the universe and reality.

        • dou9m@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Where a christian would draw faith from their spiritual deity, a humanist might draw faith from the fact that they’re alive because of the human spirit, no? A “spirit” which only exists because an absurdly bizarre amount of coincidences happened… so many in fact, that it honestly makes total sense that even the most intelligent people among us could believe (or in my perspective: fall for) that it was actually instead the doing of a being who is in a completely different realm of existence from our own.

          I promise I’m not just being pedantic or whatever, I’m truly trying to understand how there’s any difference between a philosophy effectively based on some santa-clause-tier shit and one simply based on the (actually phenomenal) evidence we have available.

          Hell, I even grew up as a christian before I gained full consciousness and wondered why the fuck god would torture me with a life that is so comically filled with absolute horrors that go beyond anything I would comprehend on my own.