A woman who previously dated Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner said he drunkenly forced her to have sex after she told him to stop, according to a Politico report released Monday, leading prominent supporters to pull their endorsements and throwing a must-win race for the party into turmoil.

Platner denied the allegation, but said he would be considering next steps for his campaign.

“Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we’re taking the time to reflect on the best path forward,” he said in a video released on social media.

Jenny Racicot, who lives in Maine, told Politico that Platner entered her home in 2021 while drunk and assaulted her. Racicot said she had been in an on-and-off relationship with Platner, but she cut off contact with him after that night and told him the incident wasn’t consensual. A voicemail left at a number listed for Racicot seeking comment did not receive an immediate response.

Platner’s campaign did not immediately respond to an email and phone message from The Associated Press seeking comment.

“Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically false,” Platner said in his video.

Still, the allegation sparked a flight away from a candidate who has long been controversial. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who’d stood by Platner even as the insurgent candidate was hit with prior allegations, said Monday’s was enough. “I’ve been very clear that sexual assault or violence against women is a red line,” Khanna said. “These allegations are very serious and credible. Graham Platner should drop out from the race. I am withdrawing my endorsement.”

Edit: holy shit, these comments are insane.

Regardless of what you believe with this, Platner likely cannot win anymore. He has a week to do the right thing and drop out before he’s fully locked in. If he actually gives any sort of a shit (and doesn’t just want power, like rapists seeking office tend to), he needs to drop out yesterday.

This is the nail in the coffin for his campaign. It’s not time to defend him no matter what, because there’s still a week where a new candidate can be put into place. Instead of being mad at people not wanting to vote for him, you should start vocally supporting another candidate.

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yes, you are spreading fake news.

    Let’s actually be specific.

    This women has produced dated text messages discussing the assault prior to Planter’s campaign.

    This is the only contemporary digital record alleged in any of the stories:

    Racicot shared with POLITICO a series of private Facebook messages she exchanged with an acquaintance in 2023, about a year and a half after the alleged assault and well before Platner launched his political career, in which she cautioned the acquaintance against getting involved with Platner. In the messages, Racicot said she had “ended up in a bad situation with him,” describing Platner as “consensually careless” and saying he “doesn’t listen to you when drunk.” Reached by POLITICO, the acquaintance said she received the messages but declined to comment; POLITICO granted her anonymity at her request to protect her privacy in her Maine community.

    So, facebook messages, not text. And she didn’t discuss the assault at all, at least not beyond very general terms. And the people involved are anonymous. It seems she never explicitly said “he assaulted me” to her friends. She made vague allegations that could describe a lot of scenarios, some that would be disqualifying, some not.

    Additionally I’ve heard there are dated therapists notes, but I haven’t seen those.

    Please provide a source, not just “I heard.” Because the Politico and NYTimes articles make zero mention of contemporary therapist notes. You are spreading misinformation. There are therapist notes, but they’re not contemporaneous.

    • Jordan117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They’re not anonymous to Politico, they would have spoken to them and verified their identities. They’re only anonymous in the story to protect them from harassment from creeps who think they’re part of a conspiracy.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Holy shit dude, those messages are not ambiguous at all. Stop supporting rapists. You sound a lot like a MAGA cultist

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are ambiguous! Holy shit, stop supporting political opportunists, you sound like a corporate Dem.

        “ended up in a bad situation with him,”

        “consensually careless”

        “Doesn’t listen to you when drunk”

        This could describe anything from a guy who puts an unwanted hand on someone’s shoulder to full on rape. That’s extremely ambiguous! No where does she allege a rape or assault explicitly. That doesn’t disprove the rape allegation, but it’s also hardly evidence for it.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s really not ambiguous at all since she told us what happened.

          Even without context it’s not ambiguous at all if you’ve ever spoken with a woman.

          You’ve done it, you’ve gone full MAGA. Rape supporting and everything

          • Poxlox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You’re a proper cunt if you’re calling someone who’s doubting the hyper convenient story of a probable political operative to “supporting rape”. You shouldn’t throw that kind of statement around lightly. EVERY REPUBLICAN SUPPORTS CHILD RAPE since they refuse to prosecute Epstein criminals.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Fine keep supporting select rapists if that’s what you want.

              None for me thanks

          • RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            Let’s say we grant you that he raped her.

            This man was a blackwater merc and this is the line we draw? Nah fuck that, we were willing to swallow him being a bloodthirsty maniac but now that the victim is white it’s a problem?

            With any luck this guy will bring the sheer, unhinged, ultra violence that seems to follow him directly into the capitol and honestly we can’t afford to purity test our way out of victory.

            Go back to your office fed boy.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Feel free go through my history. I supported and defended that man until this point. You’re just a monster

              At some point it’s no longer a purity test, it’s setting the standard that we shouldn’t keep electing racists to congress

              • RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Than we lose. Our opponent does not have these kinds of misgivings and has the ability to leverage more moves than we do in this game because of it.

                If you supported him up to this point you’re literally saying “yeah, the brutal pogrom of violence against untold civilians which almost certainly included assault on women and children was one thing, but did you know he may have sexually assaulted a white woman?”

                Explain to me how you were cool with being a blackwater merc but not this?

                • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  I doubt you’d understand, but I full recognize that the military industrial complex is designed to prey on underprivileged youths or those with misplaced patriotism to joining. From their you are isolated and indoctrinated. Moving past that indoctrination and regretting what you did, as he’s stated, shows growth and character development.

                  Rape is just rape. Not indoctrination or anything like that. Completely of his own volition. Speaks volumes

                  If you told he raped someone during his military or mercenary time I’d feel the same way

                  The fact that I even have to say that is mind boggling. This nation is beyond fucked

                  • RumRunningDevil@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Go through my history. 9 years in the navy. I know how it works. He chose multiple tours and then PMC work after that. And you know what? I bet he was real good at killing.

                    Your making the claim that choosing to re-enlist for another tour, getting out, not using the GI bill, and instead joining the most infamously violent PMC in the country was forgivable indoctrination, but we have allegations of sexual assault and that’s the straw that broke the camels back?

                    Fed