…at these currently heavily subsidized costs.
… all 13 companies likely supply the AI ;)
13% (presumably 12.5%) means 1 in 8.
CxOs with their Thought Leadership™️ and outside the box (follow the herd) thinking have done everything they can to reduce the cost and chaos of humans in their company, and prioritising the reverse centaur approach to LLMs for short term gain instead of making them centaurs: a useful tool to enhance their productivity for long term results.
And now they’re waving their hands in despair, wondering who’s to blame. It can’t be them, by definition.
Let them burn. Let those companies die. Piss on their ashes. Blacklist the people involved. It’s more than they deserve.
Most companies don’t know how to use this, or are too bureaucratic to leverage LLMs correctly.
Yeah. It’s not some magic money printer. It’s got use cases and it’s got abuse cases.
Lots of companies finding out expensive lessons on which is which.
LLMs aren’t going to replace a workforce, isn’t going to maintain your entire enterprise stack, and isn’t going to be able to handle the bulk of your CSR work.
But there sure are lots of people blowing millions trying to see if they can be the “one off” from everyone else who failed.
In a company with 100 engineers, AI replaces some as tasks are fullfilled faster.
Well, ideally that would mean you are able to increase production with the same people and produce more for the same budget. Not cut heads.
Most companies don’t have any engineers and just glue everything together in Salesforce and Excel.
All those comp should try and remove AI from their processes. Good luck untangling that big ball of mud after they let go 80% of engineers.
only nvidia is the only see marginal returns.
I think we should have one more meeting about how to best use AI for our work. Yes, one more meeting will fix everything. I have already booked a 3-hour time slot in the meeting room with the bad ventilation. You better be there.
So you are saying there’s a chance?
Lol
