inari@piefed.zip to Programming@programming.devEnglish · edit-28 days agoI built a programming language that LLMs can't useblog.picheta.meexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down128
arrow-up152arrow-down1external-linkI built a programming language that LLMs can't useblog.picheta.meinari@piefed.zip to Programming@programming.devEnglish · edit-28 days agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up49arrow-down1·8 days agoThis is interesting because even though they designed the language to be impossible for LLMs to use, Claude still scored nearly 70% on their benchmark.
minus-squareOldMrFish@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down3·edit-28 days agoAlternative headline: Claude scores 70% on benchmark in esoteric language it hasn’t been trained on. That’s basically an ad for Claude Code…
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 days agoNot only was Claude not trained on it, but the language is actively trying to be hostile towards it.
minus-squareMirodir@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down2·8 days agoAnd that’s without any of this being in its training set. I wonder if they realized how big of a self own that is.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down8·8 days agoHow the hell is this a “self own”?
This is interesting because even though they designed the language to be impossible for LLMs to use, Claude still scored nearly 70% on their benchmark.
Alternative headline: Claude scores 70% on benchmark in esoteric language it hasn’t been trained on. That’s basically an ad for Claude Code…
Not only was Claude not trained on it, but the language is actively trying to be hostile towards it.
And that’s without any of this being in its training set. I wonder if they realized how big of a self own that is.
How the hell is this a “self own”?