"The Supreme Court’s attacks on voting rights are about rigging elections for Republicans," said Rep. Greg Casar, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
Good point but then the extra justices would have to be paid with taxpayer money, and more justices would be asking questions in cases before the entire court.
No you’d still have 9 hearing a case you’d just have sets. There’s no rule that says every justice has to hear every case. Staye courts already work this way.
More justices won’t hear more cases since all the justices hear the same cases. It might be slower since more justices would now be asking questions.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitAssignments.aspx
more justices would spread the circuit assignment load over a larger number, allowing more cases to be evaluated for the supreme court.
for example, alito is above the third and fifth circuits.
Good point but then the extra justices would have to be paid with taxpayer money, and more justices would be asking questions in cases before the entire court.
lol wtf
you really didn’t understand the assignment at all.
No you’d still have 9 hearing a case you’d just have sets. There’s no rule that says every justice has to hear every case. Staye courts already work this way.