• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Since the article doesnt make it clear

    This is for new or re-activating customers in a congested area.

    This isnt a random usage fee, this is for areas they claim are too busy, so you gotta pay if you want to gain access.

    Its like when you call a contractor and they quote you a stupid high number. Its often because they’re too busy, but if you’ll pay the stupid high number theyll do it.

    There was no world where SpaceX could support unlimited customers in a cell region.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      45 minutes ago

      This isnt a random usage fee, this is for areas they claim are too busy, so you gotta pay if you want to gain access.

      Congestion pricing is the PC way to describe it.

      Price gouging is the more honest term.

      There was no world where SpaceX could support unlimited customers in a cell region.

      You can charge a fixed rate and ration bandwidth during peak use.

      Or you can charge a variable rate in order to maximize revenue during peak demand.

      One maximizes utility while the other maximizes profit.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 minutes ago

        Neither of those options would support everyone living in a high density urban area, bandwidth would drop to nothing and no one would want to buy it, and people generally hate inconsistent bandwidth, or random peak hour usage charges on their bill.

        Edit: Their overall bandwidth per cell is just too low to be able to support everyone in high density areas like that.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 minutes ago

          That’s why dense urban communities prefer using ground fiber and big routing stations to cellar satellite, sure.

          But now we’re talking about the real bandwidth capacities, not the pricing for connectivity.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 minutes ago

            I mean don’t get me wrong, it’s 100% pure capitalism to do something like, we can confidently service 1000 people per cell region and maintain our advertised service, but once we reach 950, we’re going to charge super high fees to connect. They don’t have to be doing what they’re doing, but they saw a way to make money.

            Edit: And this is all assuming the congestion is even real.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 minutes ago

              I don’t doubt the congestion is real, as consumption - especially data consumption - rapidly expands to fill its container.

              I might suggest that some of the early adopters and insiders are receiving subsidy rates in order to goose Elon’s investor briefs on adoption. And the folks on the back end who are eating the exploding prices exist to pad Musk’s proposed future revenue estimates.

              “We added 10,000 people a day for the last 30 days, even as we raised rates from $10/day to $100/day!” tells a very attractive story to investors without tipping your hand and revealing what the next 30 days will look like. But it also becomes a kind-of self-fulfilling prophecy, when it results in banks giving you another hundred billion dollars in low-interest credit to expand your network.