• FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I still do not understand why they don’t use heat exchange loops, like we figured out for nukes 75 years ago

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Because it’s considerably cheaper to do it this way and they’re being allowed to do so. Why would they spend money building giant cooling towers when they can just dump the hot water into the river and then drain main supply for fresh supply.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They usually do. They just do the same thing a lot of nuclear reactors do and also evaporatively cool one end of the heat exchange loop.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        As far as I can see they don’t ever do it that way, that’s the problem, if it was a closed loop they wouldn’t be pulling water from the mains and causing water pressure issues for everybody else.

    • binux@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      It’s as the case is with everything for these parasites: if it loses them too much money or makes them too little, they avoid it like the plague. It’s cheaper upfront to just run it through an open system.