• thesohoriots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Pink slime” describes sites that present themselves as legitimate news sources but in fact are funded — without any disclosure to readers — by political or ideological interests that are pushing an agenda.

    • America@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The term “pink-slime journalism” was coined by journalist Ryan Smith in 2012.[4] A related term, “news mirage”, was coined in 2024 by journalists Miranda Green and David Folkenflik to refer to websites that “look like news, but in truth [serve as] mouthpieces” for corporations or advocacy groups with a non-journalistic agenda.[7]

      I’m still no closer to understanding why it’s called pink slime

      • paranoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s a reference to Ghostbusters 2 and how people running those sites make everyone angry by spreading negativity

          • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Not so gullible after all are you.

            You are correct, it’s actually a reference to highly processed “pink slime meat” made by taking low quality meat meat scraps, chemically sterilizing them within an inch of their life and forcing them through a fine mesh at high pressure, then forming the resulting homogenized slime into a shape that vaguely resembles a real cut of meat. You know, low quality hot dogs, chicken cutlets and nuggets, hamburger, that kind of thing. Stuff that is technically “meat” but mostly the stuff you’d only eat if you were desperate.

            • America@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              I had to verify that you were at least partly right. For, to amend untruth with even greater untruth would be utterly diabolical and also a little funny

      • moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        What trash news are you reading?

        There’s loads of great independent news outlets in the US, that are run by people and don’t accept money from corporations

        • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          tone it down.

          You reply this immediately attacking me by assuming I’m reading some “trash” below your station. The implication you’re making is that I’m too stupid to recognize it as trash, like you…

          Everyone thinks “their” news is the real, unbiased source. You are not immune to propaganda.