Renaming the category doesn’t change the engineering questions: what benchmark is improving, how often does the system fail, and who is accountable when it acts on a bad output? “Super Intelligence” sounds like a branding exercise unless it comes with measurable definitions and independent evaluation.
Renaming the category doesn’t change the engineering questions: what benchmark is improving, how often does the system fail, and who is accountable when it acts on a bad output? “Super Intelligence” sounds like a branding exercise unless it comes with measurable definitions and independent evaluation.