US Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson said on Friday he would resist describing AI agents as ​autonomous actors that “break loose” with “wills and desires of their own,” suggesting the developers who instruct agents would be the ones liable ‌for harm.

“I’m going to continue as long as I am chairman to resist this anthropomorphizing of these tools,” Ferguson said at the Reuters Momentum AI Austin event. “If someone tells a tool to do something, and the tool does it, I don’t think we would say, ‘Oh, what do we do about the tool?’”

Ferguson’s remarks illustrated potential avenues for the Trump administration to take ​as incidents rise in which agentic AI testing resulted in unauthorized access to corporate or government data.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes. But we often let kids off easy because they’re kids, they don’t really understand the impact of what they’re doing.

    Usually in those cases we’d go after the provider for letting kids run dangerous software unsupervised.

    • TronBronson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      What dangerous software are we talking about? Can you give a previous example of readily available software kids could cause harm with? Which company was making that again?