• lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    29 days ago

    According to Bloomberg Law, Apple didn’t agree with the jury’s decision nor the damages and would appeal the verdict.

    It’s alleged until the appeals stop, then it’s the final verdict

    • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It’s generally accepted that a jury verdict is final at the moment it’s accepted by the trial court. So no “alleged” is needed. It’s not technically wrong to use it as a descriptive choice, since it’s now both factually established and still alleged, but it’s misleadingly tentative and not required.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It’s alleged until the appeals stop, then it’s the final verdict

      It’s only alleged until the verdict drops. Whether or not they appeal, they are currently found guilty of the crime, ergo, not “alleged”.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      The same can be said about any crime though, right? If you’re found guilty of murder, they drop the alleged and you’re just a murder. If you successfully appeal, then the title is dropped.