Whether intentionally or not, what do movies depict or present wrong a lot of the time?

  • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s why I don’t believe space travel will ever be as easy as depicted in shows like Star Trek. I cannot believe the human body can withstand such speeds. But I could be wrong. A lot of current technology, I would have said was impossible a few decades ago

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Well their way around it in Star Trek is to say that the ships aren’t moving at fantastic ftl speeds. They’re warping space to make the distances between those points shorter, and then traveling at a reasonable speed across that (briefly) shorter distance. So they don’t need to expose humans to extreme g forces.

      Warp drives are loosely based on a real theory, an Alcubierre drive, but as far as I know, while the idea is mathematically sound, it’s practically quite impossible. They would require some unfathomable amounts of energy to operate as well as matter with negative mass (which is not a thing).

    • jafffacakelemmy@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      The human body can stand very fast speeds, but it can’t cope with acceleration. To reach high speed you have to accelerate HARD. Otherwise it’s weeks and months just to get moving quickly. And don’t get me started on slowing down when you get there…

      • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        And speed is relative to point of view. If you look at an airplane from the ground it moves pretty fast but for the people on board their reference is the plane itself and they’re pretty much stationary. And, similarily to airplane, when craft speed or direction changes the force required affects to people on board too and that’s where limits of the human body come up pretty quickly.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Acceleration at one gravity is 9.81ms-1 which is about 35km/h per second. That would take about a year to reach close to the speed of light.

        You’d then need to spend the same amount of time slowing down.

        So to get to our nearest stellar neighbour (alpha centaurii 4.3 LY distant) you still need to coast for about 2.3 years in the middle of the journey.

        This is all assuming you can provide that much thrust constantly for two years.

        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          See The Expanse if you want to see this in action at speeds significantly less than c.

          Edit: Even for just getting around in the solar system, they had to magic up some chemicals to allow the human body to withstand deceleratory g-forces strong enough to keep travel times short enough to not completely wreck the narrative.

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I wish they expanded on that in the Halo lore. They have these “orbital drop pods” that contain one soldier and are launched at ridiculous speeds towards the ground for quick battlefield insertion. They never address the sudden decrease in velocity, not a single line of dialogue mentions something like an “inertial dampener”. It’s odd because other systems are typically introduced or hinted at in dialogue, so as to ground the story I guess. (slipspace most notably being their version of FTL travel)

        • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          They do slow down after a bit:

          Once nearing the ground, drop pods activate a drag chute (more formally termed a “Drogue Panel”[10]) formed from the upper-most panels. The chute deploys and begins to slow down the pod’s descent. Once about 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) from the ground, a series of computer-controlled retrothrusters engage and rapidly decelerate the pod such that it can impact safely.

          Also most (not all) drop pod deployments are used by specialized troop like ODST or spartans:

          Of these, the UNSC are particularly reliant on the use of drop pods thanks to the aptly-named Orbital Drop Shock Troopers; specialised shock troops who specialise in the use of drop pods to insert behind enemy lines and conduct special missions.[7][8] Although the ODSTs are the primary users of drop pod insertions in the UNSC, both Spartans and regular Marine forces may also use them.[9]

          https://www.halopedia.org/Drop_pod

            • spectrums_coherence@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I see your point, but to give that particular game scene plenty of benefit of the doubt: that pod transports a spartan. It is possible that he intensionally disabled the slow deceleration, because he can handle the impact.

              • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yea spartans are supposed to be quite sturdy I reckon. I haven’t read the books but I heard they regularly do crazy shit in them

    • 1D10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      One of my favorite sci-fi books has the main character going through the thousands of paper files stored in his space ship.

      But computers still work with our current understanding of physics, I’m far from being an expert but without magic I don’t see a way for faster then light or time travel to work.