I understand the consensus at large is no, but what if they could be used for, say, administrative purposes, or some other task which, though not unimportant, might be considered trivial compared to, say, surgery or assessments?

Just a thought.

Also, in addition to whether such technology should be used, do you believe it to be inevitable in any case?

To be sure, I’m not advocating for or against it, merely curious what other people’s opinions are and why they hold such opinions on this potentially inevitable subject

  • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Administrative roles still can result in things like the wrong mediation being administered or an important procedure being rejected.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        YES

        They already design systems that give predictable results and those are complicated and require constant upkeep as things chsnge over time. These systems still have issuee.

        AI would be worse than that.