• silasmariner@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You don’t need to be able to build stable functional software to be a hacker. They’re kinda polar opposites

    • h4lf8yte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      To create a linux distribution under your own control you don’t even need to engineer anything new. You need to create deployment structures but the tools for repository hosting, package managers, build services, automation and pki are already there. It’s more about curating software and sometimes auditing or changing code. Someone who’s capable of reverse engineering Blu-ray player firmware should be able to learn this as well.

      Edit: ‘A new distro’ is also a spectrum. It’s a big reach from creating a debian distro with some version differences to something like openwrt or asahi linux

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Like saying you don’t need to be a structural engineer to demolish a skyscraper. You need to be pretty well versed in computer science to be able to hack a system to any reasonable extent. If you just go ham at it and just press random buttons nothing is going to happen / you’re going to be detected.

      Hackers write programmes all of the time.

      • silasmariner@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Not really. Big different between programs and systems. Saying ‘good at doing teh codez’ is just one set of skills is nonsense. And being a structural engineer is not sufficient to build a skyscraper anyway. In the immortal words of Le Corbusier, they’re machines for living in. Which is why architect is a different career from structural engineer and both get involved. Your exanple undermines your own point.