hi. i’m looking for an extremely simple selfhosted photo gallery software.
i have photos from my laptop, a camera, and my phone. they are all rsync’ed onto my server. so on the server I have ~/Pictures/Laptop ~/Pictures/Camera ~/Pictures/Phone filled with JPEG/PNG/HEICs and no subdirectories.
i want to view photos from all three directories on a single timeline/feed, from the web (and if possible, via a mobile app). currently I VNC onto the server to run XnView and check each directory and this is a terrible user experience especially on a phone.
i don’t want to run a separate database or anything complex, so things like Immich or Photoprism are not an option. would be nice to be able to assign a tag to some images (“work”, “computer”, …) but it’s not a necessity. and i don’t need the ability to edit/remove images from the gallery.
i’ve considered rolling my own solution but thought there might be something already available.
thanks!
You must log in or register to comment.
Another vote for Immich. Running it with docker compose is trivial. Been using it for 2 years now and it’s been glorious. Running it without docker would take more setup, not sure how complex.
I’ve been using Immich for a couple of years now, and I really like. Nextcloud is good, too.
Immich works really well. Don’t fear the database. Docker makes it all super easy too.
Alternatively, Plex manages photos ok-ish.
I really don’t want another complex service i have to manage. ideally i want something that’s a simple python/perl/php script or something like that.
forgot to mention in OP but I run freebsd on my server and it’s possible to run docker(podman) with linux emulation if it’s very necessary, but i prefer not to use it
I hear you, I went through the same journey. After getting Immich set up, I haven’t had to do a single thing to it. There are scripts that can turn your folders into Immich albums, so I just set up the docker containers, ran the script, and watched as everything was created for me without more labor on my part.
I hope somebody else has the solution you’re looking for, but if you don’t find it, I really think you should give it a whirl because it turned out to be way easier than I expected it to be.
Immich isn’t complex, and I don’t think it requires a separate database.
Edit: just checked and technically it does, but if you use the docker compose then it deploys it automatically and you don’t have to think about it at all.
Edit2: if you really want something dead simple, yeah you could trivially write a tiny script to list and thumbnail images. I’m sure there are apache plugins for exactly this.
You’re likely not going to find something so simple and lightweight. Immich has some setup, but if you want a good gallery that’s the way to go. Don’t be afraid of the learning.
It does nothing but serve photo. Background tasks are minimal and many of them only run once on new photos.
PiGallery/PiGallery2 , Photoview, HomeGallery, lychee, or thumbsup might be up your alley.
Personally I use Immich and ImmichFrame.
TinyWebGallery?
this might actually work. thanks!
PiGallery is what you’re asking for, but you should consider Immich, it’s very simple to setup and you’ll get tons of features more that are extremely useful. I get you want something simple, but I don’t feel Immich is hard to setup or maintain, and it’s the difference between a simple photo gallery and google photos.
deleted by creator
It looks like every reply in this is a near miss so I’ll add another one to the pile: I’ve been working on a hosted immich platform for people who want privacy from big tech and don’t want to / can’t self host it at https://photos.minpin.me
Here to suggest piwigo. Use it with docker, zero hassle but I think it does depend on a database, so it might be too heavy for your use case. Supports tags & galleries.
I’ve been using PiGallery2 for this https://github.com/bpatrik/pigallery2
But I do deploy via docker.
I have no experience with it, but my questions along a similar vein point to DigiKam.
i have used DigiKam in the past, it’s more of an alternative to XnView not a selfhosted gallery… it doesn’t even support mobile phones or web
