• asmoranomar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The problem is that you cannot guarantee a date for which something may go bad. It would end up still being a freshness date, because you can guarantee that. Semantics, I know, but could you imagine someone suing because a can of tuna was still edible despite its “do not consume” date?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      People will sue for any reason.

      But that was kinda my point, I understand that food can be good past a “use by”. But if people want to make it literally about safety there should be a “do not consume” date.