I’m not an AI techie and I’m not well educated on LLMs/AI in general. The issue I’m having is the dichotomy between how people talk about it. I’ve heard completely opposite ends of the spectrum. From AI is quickly becoming advanced enough to threaten human society, all the way to its a glorified dictionary/search engine that can’t really do much of anything. I know Lemmy has a steep anti-AI slant. But, can someone talk about this in a way I can wrap my head around why the divide seems so big?
I was in machine learning for a bit, up until venture capitalists eviscerated research teams chasing ways to make money from it. While there’s definitely a degree of overhyping risks for investment, there are absolutely some real, tangible risks. But the dangers aren’t like skynet/terminator, its more of a slow decline in knowledge combined with an increase of predictive surveillance (https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10739 as an example of why predictive surveillance should worry everyone)
Every mistake and error in token generation is getting confounded with human text, and being fed back as part of the training loop. Combined with the sheer amount of botting of the modern internet, you get a feedback loop of error being used to train, followed by output of that error dominating the next training cycle as bots drown out voices of the knowledgable. For some basic things it’s easy to see the error, but in any expert domain the ratio of bots to experts is large enough that expert knowledge won’t stay within the training distribution.