I’m not an AI techie and I’m not well educated on LLMs/AI in general. The issue I’m having is the dichotomy between how people talk about it. I’ve heard completely opposite ends of the spectrum. From AI is quickly becoming advanced enough to threaten human society, all the way to its a glorified dictionary/search engine that can’t really do much of anything. I know Lemmy has a steep anti-AI slant. But, can someone talk about this in a way I can wrap my head around why the divide seems so big?

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    How will “AI kill us all”? I can see it creating harm and getting people out of jobs. But kill us??

    • Tarambor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How will “AI kill us all”? I can see it creating harm and getting people out of jobs. But kill us??

      There are currently 120 dead Iranian schoolgirls as a result of AI targetting and it using 10 year old out of data data.

      The IDF have been using AI for target selection in the Gaza war.

      There’s been a story this week where AI was used by the US military in analysis of a Chinese cargo ship and concluded it was carrying nuclear weaponry components to Iran. The US military were planning on boarding the vessel which would be considered an act of war. Only a last minute analysis of the intelligence revealed it was false.

    • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Developing new viruses and deadly diseases that spread too fast to be cured. By enabling low cost sensors to resolve messy data for low cost high precision weapons. By eroding the skillset of humanity so that we just fail in a few generations. By accelerating how we were already killing ourselves.