This is intended as a broad and open ended question.

  • soyslurper2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 days ago

    Dress shoes

    Rich people wanted to pretend they always ride horses, so they always wore slim shoes. This became the standard for all shoes, and everyone has been suffering since

  • Melobol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 days ago

    Those k-cups, and disposable vapes… You know what? Anything that has disposable in their name.

    Yes even baby and feminine products.
    Disposable cutlery, disposable bags, FAST fashion, the freaking packaging, the non returnable glass/plastic bottles.

  • the_fuckler@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 days ago

    Surveillance cameras. I get it’s a hot topic right now but I’ve hated them for a long time particularly in work environments. The crimes they prevent have never overcame the abusive relationship I perceive in them

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 days ago

    The concept of proprietary parts.

    If your product is so shitty that your plan to make money is to be the only supplier of parts when it breaks theb just fuck off into the sea.

    • alternategait@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      I sat and thought one time about what it would take to replace the plastic I have touched. Most of it is easy to think of good replacements, but there’s a whole bunch more of medical stuff that I can’t imagine replacing.

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    The personal automobile. Hands down the worst thing to happen to humanity until we kill ourselves with nuclear winter later this year.

  • moondoggie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not quite technology, unless you factor in the development of cable TV, but 24 hour news networks. That was the start of news as entertainment, as they didn’t have enough to fill 24 hours and had to do whatever they could to get and retain viewers.

  • Denjin@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m still annoyed at that first fish that thought “I wonder if I could live on the land”

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Derivatives and other complex financial instruments.

    Tools for cheating others out of money, obfuscating transactions or skirting legal restrictions.

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Landfills I guess? If the idea of just… disposing of something was never normalized, we might be more conscientious about what we make and what becomes of it when we don’t need it any more.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think it’s quite a bit more complicated than this. The concept of disposing of something always existed, but for most of human history that meant just leaving waste where it fell or at most tossing it at the edge of the village.

      It’s only once larger settlements appeared that a need to concentrate waste in one location to avoid despoiling the entire area became necessary. This was greatly compounded with the invention of manufactured materials that don’t biodegrade like glass and plastic. There was no other solution to this than to concentrate and bury waste so it didn’t end up everywhere.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s what I’m getting at. Biodegradable refuse is one thing, maybe once civilization grows you can’t just toss your apple core wherever. Central composting is fine.

        But it’s exactly once non-biodegradable trash enters the picture that the problem arises. If, the first time someone just tossed out some artificial thing, people said “What are you doing? That’s gonna stay there”, maybe we would have taken more care in the things we produce and given more consideration to their lifespan.

        • str82L @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I really really want to agree, but this feels like a battle against entropy. That’s not a battle you’re going to win unfortunately. Maybe just the attempt is worthwhile? Maybe that’s what humans do, try to impose a sense of control in a universe that’s slowly but inevitably working against that. At least it’s fun to try I guess.

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Landfills actually seem to be endorsed by civil engineers to some degree (while also acknowledging that genuine Reuse, Recycle, or Combustion of products would be better)

      GRADY (Practical Engineering) has videos on this. Here is one

      I can’t really remember what i learned from this video though - it might be entirely about the effort it takes to protect the surrounding soil from leeching (chemicals and plastic want to go into the soil and mess it up!). So the sole engineering benefit of landfill might be that it literally fills in places where soil was “mined” to be used as gardening and construction materials.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I’ve seen that one. Don’t get me wrong, I appreciate the engineering that goes into a modern landfill. If you’re going to accumulate a bunch of refuse, a landfill is the way you deal with it.

        I just wish we never decided it was okay to just throw away the things we make. I nearly said “garbage”, but that didn’t really feel like an invention. Imagine if the idea of just “disposing” of something was as bizarre to everyone else as it is to an environmentalist. If you make something that doesn’t bio-degrade, you have to figure out something to do with it when you’re done because there’s no such thing as “trash”.

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Around the US, you can still find lots of buildings that have a disused trash incinerator in the basement or out in a back alley. At one time it was common, basically everywhere, to burn solid waste on site.

      I think eliminating that practice was both good and bad. Good because burning waste in what basically amounts to a burn barrel with a smoke stack is nasty and produces tons of pollution which has lots of negative health related side effects, among other things.

      Bad because it masked, maybe even helped exacerbate, the problem of generating and dealing with increasing amounts of trash. Now, instead of having to choke on billowing clouds of black smoke, you just throw your garbage in a dumpster where it gets hauled away out of sight and dumped in someone else’s back yard. That has consequences too. There are mismanaged landfills all over the place that cause lots of problems. But for most people, they’re out of sight and therefore out of mind.

      And burying trash in the ground is cheap. So much useable stuff gets thrown away because it’s much cheaper, in the short term, to just throw it away.

      It’s shameful. But I don’t know what else to expect from a society that primarily runs on greed.