Donald Trump pledged Wednesday to send every American adult $5,000 if Republicans retain control of the House and Senate in the midterm elections, an extraordinary gambit to reverse his party’s sagging fortunes in November.

The dubious promise would likely cost more than $1 trillion and require congressional approval, and would further exacerbate the country’s nearly $1.8 trillion annual budget deficit and concerns about inflation.

    • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yep. And you know what they say about bribery:

      Article II, Section 4: The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The key thing is “…on Impeachment for, and Conviction of…” Which isn’t going to happen if things stay as they are.

        • queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t know. This is pretty brazen, and the midterms aren’t looking good for the Republicans. If enough GOP congressfolk think they’d be better off facing the midterms under the stalwart leadership of President Vance, I could see them moving en masse behind an impeachment push. The ball has to start rolling somewhere though, and I don’t know which representative would be likely to introduce articles and palatable to enough Republicans that they could join under the color of bipartisanship.

          All that presumes a congress that doesn’t suck though, and when in doubt, congress sucks. Being the first mover is dangerous, especially with Trump still at the helm. I’m not saying it’s likely, but it could happen.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Any Republican worth anything would do it “as a patriot.” Bipartisanship is fine, but “patriotism” is their whole thing. When a president does something this bold it should be easy to benefit by being someone who actually stands up for what they speak about so often. Obviously this is in a sane world though, and it also requires that they care about real patriotism, not nationalism.

            • tmyakal@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 minutes ago

              This is especially true when the guy you need to stand up to has a 32% approval rating. It’s not hard to look good when you’re kicking the guy no one likes, and it honestly might be the move to flip centrists away from the “woke” progressives that are winning primaries.

              Not that I want that. I’d rather have the progressives win and start sending fuckers to the Hague. But I’d be shocked if there wasn’t some conservative think-tank mapping out this possibility.