The cattle ranch at the center of the case demands strict drone regulations, saying legal flyovers threatened “food security.”
The cattle ranch at the center of the case demands strict drone regulations, saying legal flyovers threatened “food security.”
I fail to see the part where they claim there is any substantive risk to food security. Like, yes, exactly, they are using the footage to trigger investigations. Because you’re doing illegal things. Maybe stop doing the illegal things?
Also if you’re legal, why do you care that drones look for evidence otherwise? There shouldn’t be any.