• HereIAm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, yeah they are a shit party, but isn’t smaller and local parties kinda what we want? I’d rather have a 20 small parties in parliament than 2 big ones with some on the side lines.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is like saying sure he murdered the guy with his bare hands, but doesn’t society need more face to face human interaction?

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, I just don’t think the size of the party is the thing we should criticise/make fun of it for. They’re clearly influential enough to snap up a big sponsor, and will now decide to actually try and run for parliament. UKIP was never large enough to get elected into parliament afaik, but they still managed to influence politics enough to cause brexit.

    • Cavemanfreak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      These small parties are not up for a parliamentary position though. They are only active in their municipality. There are 8 parties in the Swedish parliament (though it looks like it’s going to be 7 after the election in fall).

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re forgetting the 12% exception, but they’d probably need an even larger amount than that.