• Ashrakal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    You can’t earn so much money just to expect the responsibility won’t catch up with you. This one is a social responsibility for the impact caused.

    If he wanted a low profile, no risk job, he could always opt to not become an executive in the first place.

    • renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This is a thing? How many zeroes to your net worth do you have to be to obtain this opt, or is this readily available to the masses?

      • Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Fairly sure you can “opt out” from being shown if you live at an address and fill out some form. I think it’s available, but not exactly advertised or promoted as an option.

        I’ve seen random neighborhoods where 1 or 2 houses will randomly be blurred out.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh no, won’t somebody think of his privacy

    Btw in a completely unrelated train of thought, have you guys seen the low low prices on poo flinging trebuchets?

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I believe that you may be thinking of the newest development in the field of Advanced Manure Delivery: The Super Flamer 3000.

        Think of the SF3000 as a holistically synergetic approach to fertilizizing and pesticide treatment. Combining well known ranged incendiary technology, with state of the art manure slurry dispensation technology, the SF3000 is applied as a pre-seeding treatment. By using the manure slurry as fuel, the SF3000 is able to reduce infestation of both insects and weeds in your fields, while staying biologically sustainable.

        Look out for our TV commercials, we’ve spared no expense. We’ve got Aaron Paul to reprise his character Jesse Pinkman, in order to record our new slogan: “shits on fire yo!”

        If the concept sounds appealing we also offer the SF4000x pro, which applies AI and vision technology, to target individual undesired plants with directed high speed streams of fire.

        Ok that was actually pretty rewarding to write. I had the concept bouncing around for hours. But oh boy, imagine being killed with a pig piss fueled flamethrower, I’ve got several other ways of dieing that I’d prefer.

  • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its almost like privacy is a good thing.

    Hope nothing bad happens to you. Surely not. Flock cameras make everything safer right?

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Does he feel unsafe? Just put up a Flock camera on your house, Garrett! So we can all be sure that you are as safe as a bug all snug in a rug.

    • matlag@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Was about to say the same thing: aren’t Americans supposed to accept a trade-off between security and privacy? He’s a public figure, he should get total security with cameras everywhere around his house, and their feed should be public so that his security is crowd-managed!

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is a periodic reminder. I’m on mobile so I’m copying a previous comment.

    Flock Safety is only the tip of the problem.

    Some districts are de-Flocking only to install an Axon ALPR network service. Keep fighting until your community outlaws all ALPRs and ALPR lookups are inadmissable in court.

    There are other technologies that are already in use and widely abused by law enforcement such as IMSI catchers, geofence warrants and Drones as First Responder. Learn what your district allows and be a civil nuisance untill that shit is blocked.

    Judges have long ceased tightly constraining judicial warrants, and most courts accept the good faith exception, so US and state courts cannot be trusted with any overreaching surveillance technology or forensic tools. This includes chromatic field drug tests and detection dogs.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    He’s cool with stealing all of our data, and making us feel helpless about what others are doing with it, so I don’t see why he shouldn’t feel that same fear.

  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What’s the problem? I thought privacy was a small price to pay for “safety?”

    Sounds like that Kirk guy on guns.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    310
    ·
    2 days ago

    He should just point a flock camera at his house. Then he’ll be 80% safer based on a study I just made up like the ones on their sales pitch.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Even better, a group should cut down several dozen of them and mount them all on poles outside his house during the night, so that he wakes up to them in the morning. No vandalism, no violence, no threats, just a blunt statement that the media couldn’t possibly ignore.

      Heck, no need to even risk collecting that many real ones. I hear there’s some fairly decent 3D printed fakes available.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Then you provide the enemy with ammunition.

          They claim that the purpose of the cameras is to prevent crime, and that the people who oppose them are violent extremists. They’ve even tried to label deflock.me as a terrorist organization.

          Don’t provide the enemy with ammunition.

          • shartgargle@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            54
            ·
            2 days ago

            To be realistic, they don’t need ammunition. They just make it up anyways. It’s not about being civil and cordial anymore. Points have to be made.

            “Not giving them ammunition” means getting ignored. We can’t afford to be ignored anymore. Shit is urgent. The Epstein class needs to be afraid or we wait until they build the technology and infrastructure that allows them to completely ignore our needs/demands forever.

            Especially when the right is also mad about the tech. Strike while the iron is hot. Now is the time to act, not just have discussions. And I don’t mean violence, but let them know that card is on the table otherwise we the people will continue being ignored.

            • Whostosay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              40
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Always bothers me when people act like there is zero political violence. They are shooting us in the fucking street on film. Shits over.

              Also your username is fuckin wild lol

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I betcha if they set them up in his rich people neighborhood they wouldn‘t last for 2 days because someone with more money than him made a phone call.

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        I love this. They are solar powered so everything would work. All you need is a post hole digger to build a little flock forest.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ooh, yes someone should do this not on any particular person’s property but as an avantgarde public art installation. Not with actual Flock cameras but just some replicas. Pop it up in a couple different cities around the world.

      • dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        You are onto something. What if we just 3d print a bunch of fake cameras, wear a reflective vest, and install them in your nearby rich neighborhoods?

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Would be a shame if someone created a network of cameras tracking his every move and posted it online for free in real time. Nothing illegal about that, right? No implicit threat in that, right?