• artifex@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    4 days ago

    Another fucking slap on the wrist. “The payment will be distributed in annual instalments over a 10-year period.” It’s literally a rounding error for them. I assume this is the same lawsuit as the teen addiction one, where the states had asked for $1.4T in damages - in which case this would amount to literally 1% of the request and add insult to injury.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It’s about 2% of their annual net revenue per year for ten years. Hardly much of a punishment.

      I’m not a big fan of Steve Bannon, but I think what he said about political power is among the truest things ever said about modern politics. These big corporations, they’re not so tough. The big law firms? They’re not so tough. But the state can be tough. They’re all gutless cowards at the end of the day that would crumble if even a fraction of the power available was displayed. If one truly takes power and exercises it, that would become apparent. Trying to play nice gets you nothing but lip service and pocket change.

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The tech company will pay a maximum of $16.68bn (£12.26bn), according to court documents.

    Meta denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.

    Ok, buddy.

  • Folstar@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 days ago

    “up to” over 10 years, which means they’ll pay 1.8B this year, a massive 3% of annual income, for now and find a way to get out of this before the decade is up

      • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Where does the money go? Tax revenue? Is that how we’re making the rich pay their share? I didn’t violate any laws, but I still pay taxes and they should too — for the same reasons.

        • Folstar@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          35% to the lawyers

          15% to court, state, lawyer administrative costs

          40% to Governor’s cousin’s LLC established since last Tuesday specializing in child online safety issues according to their website which goes on to read “would you like me to create promotional flyers and other materials in addition to the website”?

          15% nobody can trace where it went - but did you know BOYS are playing GIRL sports?!

          25% to a program that passively encourages risky online behavior

          20% to pro-business tax breaks

          That’s right taxpayer, you’re gonna need to chip in for the extra 50%.

  • thejml@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Cost of doing business… if they aren’t going to own up and make changes to prevent it in the future, what’s the point?

    • Codpiece@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, paying to make their problem go away rather than going to the end of trial and getting a bigger fine and more pesky regulation.

  • Gerudo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    To be paid out over 10 years, across almost every state. Just drops in an ocean.

  • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It is now “official” that meta harms children and yet hundreds of people keep upvoting meta content here on lemmy

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Who gets the money? Is it enough to disincentives future abuses? Is the abuse still happening? Can they be trusted to not cause such abuses again?