• JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    When companies are not able to produce enough to satisfy demand and are actively stopping selling to certain sectors and harming them, they should lose their patents. RAM companies are actively harming all of us by selling their products to the AI companies and leaving us all without RAM, so we should encourage alternatives.

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      When companies are not able to produce enough to satisfy demand and are actively stopping selling to certain sectors and harming them, they should lose their patents.

      Except they stop selling to certain sectors because these sectors pay less. I am pretty sure that if a laptop maker ask to buy the RAM at a 50% higher price than AI companies, the RAM producer will happily sell to them.

      RAM companies are actively harming all of us by selling their products to the AI companies and leaving us all without RAM, so we should encourage alternatives.

      And how do you plan to keep these alternatives from selling to the higher bidder, which will probably be a AI company ?

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      So patents are stopping the whole market competition thing, like what how capitalism is supposed to work and all that.

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Only way how capitalism works is that the rich are just becoming the richer by exploiting the poor(er).

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      OK, but the leak in the article seems to have been in 2016 when conditions were very different.