here’s the thing with the Porsche analogy. you had to buy or rent the Porsche first. paid for it and used it exactly within the TOS outlined in the contract. no law was broken.
what Anthropic is arguing is that anything their model comes up with remains Anthropic IP. this means they will literally need to sue every single one of their customers first, before they even have a snowballs chance in hell of pursuing Alibaba.
they already set the precedent by not legally pursuing their customers that use paid content generated by their model, and it automatically becomes the property of the end user.
here’s the thing with the Porsche analogy. you had to buy or rent the Porsche first. paid for it and used it exactly within the TOS outlined in the contract. no law was broken.
what Anthropic is arguing is that anything their model comes up with remains Anthropic IP. this means they will literally need to sue every single one of their customers first, before they even have a snowballs chance in hell of pursuing Alibaba.
they already set the precedent by not legally pursuing their customers that use paid content generated by their model, and it automatically becomes the property of the end user.