Lemmy 1095
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day ago

The US government wants a working quantum computer by 2028 and quantum-resistant encryption by 2031

www.techspot.com

external-link
message-square
9
fedilink
39
external-link

The US government wants a working quantum computer by 2028 and quantum-resistant encryption by 2031

www.techspot.com

sanitation@lemmy.today to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day ago
message-square
9
fedilink
Just a moment...
www.techspot.com
external-link
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Shouldn’t the goals be the other way round?

    • Saffire@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They want to use the quantum computer for 3 years first before anybody else has one, and then plug the hole after they’re done.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    There already is quantum-resistant encryption. Currently, only a few categories of encryption are vulnerable to quantum-based attacks. There may be more in the future, but that’s only speculation.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well they’re in luck; the US already has working quantum computers, and quantum-resistant encryption.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      For a given definition of working, yes.

    • DevDave@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can you elaborate? Just curious what you are referring to.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        There are many quantum resistant encryption algorithms - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-quantum_cryptography#Algorithms

        As for quantum computers, there is some debate, but a number of companies have “quantum computers” but it’s arguable if they work correctly and they have limited Q-bits meaning they can’t do anything of significance yet.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML-KEM

        The original standards developed by NIST were literally called Dilithium and Kyber.

      • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t know what he’s talking about, but maybe he’s saying that the US already has quantum computers capable of breaking modern cryptography, and that it’s time to move to Post Quantum Cryptography (PGC). The process is pretty far along:

        • https://postquantum.com/industry-news/microsoft-pqc-windows/
        • https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/whats-new-post-quantum-cryptography-rhel-101

        Both sites mention “harvest now, decrypt later.” That’s an attack where someone could scoop up all the encrypted traffic/files/whatever, and just store it until quantum computers are effective at breaking it. Because of the nature of the topic nobody who knows for sure is going to say, but it’s not going to be cheap to replace all the crypto out there with PGC so there’s a reason to think there’s a need even if nobody will confirm anything. I personally think just the possibility of the attack is enough reason to move if the algorithms are already in place. If you’ve got encrypted data and you expected it to stay unreadable for hundreds of years, then there’s reason to think that’s not achievable right now.

        https://nist.pqcrypto.org/foia/20250114/djb pqc paper.pdf

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.84K users / day
  • 9.1K users / week
  • 11K users / month
  • 11.1K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 85.7K subscribers
  • 776 Posts
  • 13.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org