• elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The whole minimum HW requirements is so bullshit. I have a stick pc and a tablet with some Atom CPU, 2Gb RAM, that run W10 reasonably well. No rockets and will probably choke on many apps, but for web stuff (just don’t keep more than 2-3 tabs open) media playing, and light stuff they are surprisingly capable. I have installed Antix Linux on one, and it’s a really capable machine.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Kinda, they excluded CPU’s that are no longer supported by Intel. If a vulnerability happens, Intel isn’t going to willingly provide microcode fixes. I’d say it’s old enough it’s safe, but history has proven that to be a dicey proposition. TPM was arguably bad architecture with vulnerabilities; it’s just protecting the boot chain, but BitLocker is already fucked 7 ways to Sunday.

      Trying to up their security for corporations is understandable, that’s not to say this isn’t a hard push to get people to upgrade because providing support for 10 probably costs them a lot of money.

      Requiring TPM at the install check but not actually requiring it to run is bullshit.

      LUKS on Linux is far better at protecting your equipment.

    • Trail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I have the same as a fileserver - I’ll have to take a look at what is antix, as arch has dropped support for 32bit…

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Antix is a Debian based distro for old/minimal computers. Antix has a 32 bit flavor, but applications the support 32 bit are dwindling.