Justice Department lawyers have repeatedly delayed or rebuffed the judge’s orders, culminating in a frustrating Thursday court hearing in which an exasperated but reluctant Sullivan floated the possibility of contempt proceedings.

“I just don’t want anyone to be blindsided if we have to go down that road,” he said. “It’s not a threat. It’s a promise. I have a job to administer justice, and I take that very seriously.”

  • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Judges have repeatedly said that Trump’s admin has violated their orders and they STILL haven’t done anything.

    Fucking DO IT. You make yourself look useless with these empty threats.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Sure. They could face a lot of repercussions for a lot of different bullshit.

    But will they? No, of course not. Don’t be silly.

  • jballs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    The president has not been accused of criminal wrongdoing, and one’s appearance in the Epstein files does not suggest otherwise.

    What kind of bullshit cover your ass disclaimer is that? Trump has most certainly been accused of crimes in the Epstein files.

    • quarkquasar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Hell, I accuse him on a daily basis, only because it’s so blatantly obvious.

      Even a child could accuse him, because they have first hand knowledge of his crimes.

    • Sunflier@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Prevents the spectre withholding under the president having absolute immunity from cropping up. Might be bullshit, but the judge probably wanted to quash that train from ever leaving the station.

      • raze2012@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Odd because these files are well before Trump’s presidency, let alone when that immunity clause was ruled.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Maybe. But, do you really think his cult’s attorneys wouldn’t make the argument in bad faith anyway?

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Dont forget that the establishment is not only guilty of inaction, but also preventing others from trying to stop things as well.

      • raze2012@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        No chance they do it now. They’ll do it when Trump is likely already dead, if (and only if) a proper democrat and congress comes into power, and when the sentiment tides signifigantly shift. To the point where that MAGA neighbor suddenly pretends he never voted for Trump (he voted for him 3 times. maybe 4).

        Then they will probably get 1-2 lawyers on the hook, take their license, and give them a consultant role elsewhere in government as an olive branch. Justice. I sure hope to be proven wrong, but something tells me we won’t learn from Reconstruction.

    • Heikki2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      They are playing the system. They know eventually a judge will hold them responsible. Their last move is who will enforce it… the DOJ?

      • Red0ctober@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Individual lawyers can have their law licenses revoked for their involvement. Not everyone is willing and able to sacrifice everything for the Orange shit gibbon

    • VoluntarySpud@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Once again I’m worried that absolutely nothing of consequence will occur and I have to sit here and stew in anger as our republic desiccates and rots from within T-T

    • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’ll get right on to this in a decade or so. I mean the wheels of justice turn slowly, and we wouldn’t want to undermine a sitting president or anything.

  • ryrybang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whoa guys, lookout! This judge “could” do it and he doesn’t use the word “could” lightly.

    Extremely minor chance of minor consequences. For the biggest coverup of the biggest scandal.

  • kurmudgeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Which means what? What are they going to do to the president? That man hasn’t been punished for a single fucking thing in his entire life.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    At some point we’ll need to throw are hands in the air and admit defeat. The bad guys won. They’ve been winning for a long while now.

  • seathru@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hell yeah! Slap em with that $500/day fine the taxpayers eventually cover. That’ll show them.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just do it. It is clear that the Trump Regime is not dealing in good faith.

    While at it, the judge should offer armed deputization to close relatives of the Epstein victims, for the purposes of enforcing court orders. The executive isn’t going to arrest itself.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh no! Another hollow threat that carries no meaningful punitive consequences. What ever will the DOJ do?