Nothing too serious, i want to hear your petty, your eccentric, your off beat takes.

  • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “Ignorant” does mean wilfully ignorant. It doesn’t just mean uninformed.

    To be vacant is to have been vacated.

    To be an applicant is to have applied.

    To be a claimant is to have made a claim.

    And to be ignorant is to have ignored something.

    (Of course, not all “-ant” words seem to stand alone without their suffix–at least, not in today’s vernacular. Does an arrogant person arrog? Does a fragrant flower frag? Rob Words might have more to say about the vestigial origins of some of these.)

    Can’t wait to learn how I might just be ignorant about this (by my definition or the “real” one).

      • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        To ignore is always willful, isn’t it?

        But I think one of the examples I picked has finally talked me out of this. I would happily use “vacant” to also describe a place that has never been occupied, so it didn’t require vacating to be vacant. In that case, vacate means to make vacant, not vice versa. I’ll apply that to ignore/ignorant, and I think I finally understand how people have been so comfortable with that definition.