• SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not much to abuse. The same way that the subsidizing of consoles doesn’t open it up for abuse per se

    Valve would just lose money on a lot of sales, as they can’t get a guaranteed recoup of the subsidy in the same way that Sony or Nintendo do

    • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I mean sort of, if it was heavily subsidised, people would just buy a bunch of them and make a server farm or something like that

    • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Consoles make an attempt to be a locked ecosystem - which is why they can subsidize it - because they know if you buy it your buying their games for it.

        • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          not much to abuse

          Then I’m misunderstanding this part. The PS3 compute cluster incident commented below is what came to mind.

          But in the current climate I image that if the Steam machine was heavily subsidized that there would be a subset of people abusing that by doing something like purchasing, harvesting, and immediately reselling its parts.